Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Launched August 2010

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The FE-5020 was announced 12 months earlier than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-5020 matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
FE-5020 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus FE-5020
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
FE-5020 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 features physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus FE-5020 to provide more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 367g (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $160 | $147 |