Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Also Known as X-935
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released October 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The FE-5020 was announced 6 years earlier than the WG-30 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 matches up against the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh WG-30

 FE-5020 WG-30 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-5020

 WG-30 FE-5020 
ReleasedOctober 2014July 2009More recent by 63 months

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30

 FE-5020 WG-30 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display sizing
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 features outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the FE-5020 and the WG-30.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and WG-30.

As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography details
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
35
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-30 Street photography information
60
weather sealing
lighter than average in class (137g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
61
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography information
24
weather sealing
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/500s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
45
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than average in class (137g)
weather sealing
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
71
weather proof
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography details
31
fairly wide (24mm)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
43
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16MP)
weather proof
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (24mm)
lighter than average in class (137g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
33
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus FE-5020Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-5020 Ricoh WG-30
Also called as X-935 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-07-22 2014-10-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/500 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.10 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 137 gr (0.30 lb) 192 gr (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD-Picture Card, microSD SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $160 $428