Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was announced 6 years earlier than the WG-30 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 matches up against the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh WG-30
FE-5020 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-5020
WG-30 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30
FE-5020 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 features outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the FE-5020 and the WG-30.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and WG-30.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to deliver more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $160 | $428 |