Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was brought out 6 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the FE-5020 matches up vs the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FE-5020 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus FE-5020
| WG-M1 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 62 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FE-5020 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the FE-5020 vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and WG-M1.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also called | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $160 | $2,000 |