Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
58 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Older Model is Samsung GX-10
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung GX-20, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is fairly comparable but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was revealed 19 months later than the GX-20 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the FE-5020 scores against the GX-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Samsung GX-20. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung GX-20
| FE-5020 | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 | January 2008 | Fresher by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus FE-5020
| GX-20 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung GX-20
| FE-5020 | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 offers physical measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-20 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung GX-20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 versus the GX-20.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and GX-20 is 95 and 58 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and GX-20.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FE-5020 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung GX-20 will produce more detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer FE-5020 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung GX-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung GX-20 |
| Otherwise known as | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2008-01-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4688 x 3120 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 800g (1.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 714 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $850 |