Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was introduced 10 months earlier than the HZ35W which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FE-5020 grades against the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung HZ35W
| FE-5020 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus FE-5020
| HZ35W | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung HZ35W
| FE-5020 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 has outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files but you will need to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | X-935 | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $300 |