Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011

Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung ST6500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and ST6500 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The FE-5020 was manufactured 18 months prior to the ST6500 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 grades vs the ST6500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Samsung ST6500. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung ST6500
FE-5020 | ST6500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Olympus FE-5020
ST6500 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung ST6500
FE-5020 | ST6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has measurements of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung ST6500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-5020 and the ST6500.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and ST6500 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and ST6500.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST6500 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung ST6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung ST6500 |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $160 | - |