Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB350F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the FE-5020 grades versus the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung WB350F
FE-5020 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus FE-5020
WB350F | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung WB350F
FE-5020 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-5020 vs the WB350F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and WB350F.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB350F to resolve greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB350F |
Other name | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $160 | $260 |