Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the FE-5020 grades against the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung WB35F
| FE-5020 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus FE-5020
| WB35F | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung WB35F
| FE-5020 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display size | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 offers exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the FE-5020 versus the WB35F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called as | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $160 | $130 |