Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-5020 was announced 5 years earlier than the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the FE-5020 grades versus the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Samsung WB50F
| FE-5020 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus FE-5020
| WB50F | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung WB50F
| FE-5020 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 has got external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5020 and Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 versus the WB50F.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and WB50F.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to render greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5020 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Samsung WB50F |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $160 | $180 |