Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The FE-5020 was announced 10 months before the A290 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 grades versus the A290 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sony A290
FE-5020 | A290 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus FE-5020
A290 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 10 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony A290
FE-5020 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony A290 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-5020 vs the A290.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0c84/a0c84e55e205cd3567a646d1739d5dc1ae9635f3" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and A290 is 95 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbca9/dbca9910d72748fed60b0d862f5e3445b96d8d12" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and A290.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony A290 will provide greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ed17/7ed1792d4890736e3cc25e1524e24efb6376e24f" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69f5e/69f5e25ea07d174bc271e931d207a568508c18d7" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Alternative name | X-935 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 549g (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $160 | $600 |