Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced April 2009
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") possess different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-5020 was manufactured 4 months after the HX1 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the FE-5020 scores versus the HX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sony HX1
FE-5020 | HX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus FE-5020
HX1 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony HX1
FE-5020 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | April 2009 | Same age | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Sony HX1 has measurements of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the HX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and HX1 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and HX1.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus FE-5020 will result in more detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Also called as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1440x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | 544 gr (1.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $160 | $47,999 |