Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) posses different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was introduced 4 years earlier than the RX1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the FE-5020 matches up against the RX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sony RX1
FE-5020 | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus FE-5020
RX1 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony RX1
FE-5020 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Sony RX1 has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the RX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and RX1 is 95 and 79 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and RX1.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-5020 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony RX1 will provide you with more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Otherwise known as | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 482 grams (1.06 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $160 | $2,798 |