Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and TX30 (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was released 5 years prior to the TX30 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the TX30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sony TX30
FE-5020 | TX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Olympus FE-5020
TX30 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony TX30
FE-5020 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Sony TX30 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-5020 vs the TX30.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and TX30 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and TX30.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony TX30 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Also Known as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2013-07-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lb) | 141 grams (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $160 | $230 |