Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are created by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was launched 14 months later than the E-M10 II which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the E-M10 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-M1 II | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | August 2015 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-M10 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 II
E-M1 II | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has specifications of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the E-M10 II.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-M10 II is 68 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The graphic below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and E-M10 II.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 II to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 320 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $499 |