Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5
Portability
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 II
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-M5 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was announced 4 years after the E-M5 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up against the E-M5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus OM-D E-M5. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-M5
| E-M1 II | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 |  | April 2012 | More modern by 54 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 610k | Sharper display (+427k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| E-M5 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M5
| E-M1 II | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 has measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the E-M5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-M5 is 68 and 81 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-M5.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to give you extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M5 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
exports RAW files
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M5 Street photography highlights
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than competitors (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-M5 Sports photography highlights
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect AF
bad battery power (350 shots)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M5 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors (574g)
environment sealing
features touch to focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery power (350 per charge)
weather proof
boasts touch focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography factors
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
2 card slots
bad battery power (350 shots)
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proof
no Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M5 Vlogging highlights
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competitors (574g)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-04-30 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 425g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 826 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 360 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Two | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $799 |
