Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Later Model is OM System OM-5
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M5 III, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the E-M5 III (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was unveiled 4 years earlier than the E-M5 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the E-M5 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-M5 III
E-M1 II | E-M5 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-M5 III | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | September 2016 | More recent by 37 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M5 III
E-M1 II | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 III has dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M5 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II and the E-M5 III.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-M5 III is 68 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-M5 III.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of images although you will want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older E-M1 II will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2019-10-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 414 grams (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 310 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $1,199 |