Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Released August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-P3 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was brought out 5 years after the E-P3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-M1 II matches up against the E-P3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-P3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-P3
E-M1 II | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | August 2011 | More modern by 62 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Crisper display (+423k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-P3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P3
E-M1 II | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P3 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-P3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E-P3.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-P3 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-P3.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to result in extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-08-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 369g (0.81 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 330 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $0 |