Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL1s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades against the E-PL1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL1
E-M1 II | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 78 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL1
E-M1 II | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II against the E-PL1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6852/b685246987144c076ef1410fde0291eb7473ed91" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-PL1 is 68 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4278/d427860b80625c19a25d20c0d6500ba6b5fb6d27" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-PL1.
All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to provide you with greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb9c6/fb9c6704c127f7463b5a20c95d4e7481f580ce7f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f92a/7f92acacd64e158c34cc012c9c33f93618d38330" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 334g (0.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 290 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $288 |