Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced May 2010
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-PL1s
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades against the E-PL1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL1

 E-M1 II E-PL1 
IntroducedSeptember 2016May 2010More modern by 78 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-PL1 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL1

 E-M1 II E-PL1 
Manual focus More precise focus

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II against the E-PL1.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-PL1 is 68 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-PL1.

All in all, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to provide you with greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL1
75
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Olympus E-PL1 Street photography factors
78
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
features touch focus
environment proofing
lighter than competitors (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography advice
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
supports phase detect auto focus
bad battery life (350 per charge)
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (290 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competitors (574g)
environment proofing
features touch focus
good resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery life (350 shots)
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
not so great battery life (290 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Landscape photography camera
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
two card slots
bad battery life (350 per charge)
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (2.7")
resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery life (290 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL1
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus PEN E-PL1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus PEN E-PL1
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2016-09-19 2010-05-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 334g (0.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 54
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.1
DXO Low light score 1312 487
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 290 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC card
Card slots Dual Single
Cost at release $1,700 $288