Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL2
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was manufactured 5 years after the E-PL1s which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades vs the E-PL1s in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL1s
E-M1 II | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | November 2010 | Newer by 72 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL1s | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL1s
E-M1 II | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1s has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL1s in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E-PL1s.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-PL1s is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-PL1s.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 II to show extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-11-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 334 gr (0.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 290 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $599 |