Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Released September 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are sold by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL5 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was revealed 4 years after the E-PL5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up against the E-PL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-PL5. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-PL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL5
E-M1 II | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | September 2012 | More modern by 49 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL5 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL5
E-M1 II | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL5 has specifications of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the E-PL5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-PL5 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and E-PL5.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 II to result in greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 325 gr (0.72 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 889 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 360 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $400 |