Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched August 2014
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL7
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was brought out 2 years later than the E-PL6 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the E-PL6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL6
E-M1 II | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | August 2014 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL6 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL6
E-M1 II | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has proportions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL6 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II against the E-PL6.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and E-PL6 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and E-PL6.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 II to result in more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-08-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 360 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $300 |