Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2014
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL8
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was introduced 2 years after the E-PL7 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II scores versus the E-PL7 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PL7. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL7
E-M1 II | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | September 2014 | Newer by 25 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL7 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL7
E-M1 II | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 1037k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL7 has dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E-PL7.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-PL7 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and E-PL7.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M1 II to result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL7 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2014-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 357 gr (0.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 873 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 350 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $499 |