Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL7
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL9
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was released at a similar time to the E-PL8 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M1 II grades versus the E-PL8 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PL8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL8
E-M1 II | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL8 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL8
E-M1 II | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | September 2016 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 1037k | The same display resolution | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL8 has specifications of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II and the E-PL8.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-PL8 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E-PL8.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL8 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 357 gr (0.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 350 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $500 |