Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was released 3 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 II scores against the E-PM2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PM2
E-M1 II | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | May 2013 | More recent by 41 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PM2 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PM2
E-M1 II | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the E-PM2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-PM2 is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-PM2.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to give extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 360 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $448 |