Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was brought out 3 years later than the SH-50 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the SH-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus SH-50. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SH-50
E-M1 II | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 45 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SH-50 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SH-50
E-M1 II | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SH-50.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SH-50 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The visual here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and SH-50.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SH-50 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $300 |