Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was revealed 7 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the SP-565UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 E-M1 II SP-565UZ 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2009More modern by 94 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SP-565UZ E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ

 E-M1 II SP-565UZ 
Manual focus More precise focus

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SP-565UZ.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and SP-565UZ is 68 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SP-565UZ.

As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography features
76
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
39
manual focus
exports RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low battery life (350 shots)
33
amazing zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography features
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
environment proof
offers touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
low battery life (350 shots)
52
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
very long zoom (520mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography factors
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
two card slots
low battery life (350 CIPA)
40
manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus SP-565UZ
79
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic socket
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
24
fairly wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SP-565UZ
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-09-19 2009-01-15
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 143
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-520mm (20.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.5"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lbs) 413 gr (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 30
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 18.7
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.1
DXO Low light score 1312 68
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots xD Picture Card, Internal
Card slots Dual Single
Retail cost $1,700 $400