Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 7 years after the SP-565UZ which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the SP-565UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus SP-565UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1 II | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 94 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II
SP-565UZ | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-M1 II | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f31b1/f31b10a2a8b95e0c69ed12e575581c14ec181acf" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and SP-565UZ is 68 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f399c/f399c7fc67c696bedf012b7edd4b980ea5119120" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6bf5/b6bf53e2134416b627f701b8b813400a1ce1fa41" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66101/661016c454db4c886af93f2b0aa5e09292953bb7" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $400 |