Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced June 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SZ-15, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-15 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-15 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was brought out 3 years later than the SZ-15 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-15 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II scores versus the SZ-15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus SZ-15. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SZ-15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-15
E-M1 II | SZ-15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | June 2013 | Fresher by 40 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-15 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ-15 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-15
E-M1 II | SZ-15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-15 has measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SZ-15 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II against the SZ-15.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ-15 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and SZ-15.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-15 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-06-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | AVI MPEG4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $200 |