Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/153be/153bee67a3de8b34d60d9df4ae954e556a9475c8" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR front Olympus SZ-30MR front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Released March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-30MR (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-30MR (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the SZ-30MR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-30MR being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SZ-30MR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus SZ-30MR. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-30MR
E-M1 II | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | March 2011 | More recent by 68 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ-30MR | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-30MR
E-M1 II | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-30MR has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the SZ-30MR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f2fd/1f2fd2e8f2ef1bf1f2ae839b5ecc86e8e56fd770" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ-30MR is 68 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a083f/a083fe51561e056c3319df517089876ff360a555" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and SZ-30MR.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0d4b/f0d4b4ac7b08987698476eaed8c523e33ab71c54" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df8bf/df8bf83c719ff35860a01dfb36ab215b33f1dfae" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-30MR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-30MR |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-03-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch price | $1,700 | $279 |