Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SZ-30MR front
Portability
89
Imaging
39
Features
39
Overall
39

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SZ-30MR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Released March 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-30MR (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-30MR (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the SZ-30MR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-30MR being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SZ-30MR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-30MR

 E-M1 II SZ-30MR 
ReleasedSeptember 2016March 2011More recent by 68 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kClearer display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SZ-30MR E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-30MR

 E-M1 II SZ-30MR 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-30MR has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the SZ-30MR.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ-30MR is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and SZ-30MR.

As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SZ-30MR Portrait photography highlights
76
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW files
34
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Olympus SZ-30MR Street photography highlights
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (226 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Olympus SZ-30MR
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
has phase detect AF
low battery power (350 CIPA)
41
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (220 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SZ-30MR as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
environment proofing
includes touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
low battery power (350 CIPA)
65
lighter than others in class (226g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
no Timelapse function
low battery power (220 shots)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Olympus SZ-30MR Landscape photography info
76
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
two card slots
low battery power (350 per charge)
41
really wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
low battery power (220 shots)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus SZ-30MR Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external microphone socket
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
34
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-30MR
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SZ-30MR
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SZ-30MR
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2011-03-02
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1700 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 226g (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 220 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 One
Launch price $1,700 $279