Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
79 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 402g - 116 x 87 x 57mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Successor is Olympus 1s
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 1 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 1 (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was introduced 2 years later than the 1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the 1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus 1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus 1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 1
E-M1 II | 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | November 2013 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 1
E-M1 II | 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 1 has measurements of 116mm x 87mm x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") and a weight of 402 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the 1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 1 is 68 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and 1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-on, off, redeye reduction slow sync, full, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high speed: 640 x 480 (120p), 320 x 240 (240p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 402g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 87 x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 179 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail price | $1,700 | $700 |