Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
35 Features
18 Overall
28
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 7010
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 7010, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 7010 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 7010 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was released 7 years after the 7010 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 7010 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the 7010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus 7010. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus 7010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 7010
E-M1 II | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 88 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Olympus E-M1 II
7010 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 7010
E-M1 II | 7010 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7010 has measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 7010 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II and the 7010.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 7010 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and 7010.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 7010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 7010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus 7010 |
Alternate name | - | mju 7010 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 145 gr (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $200 |