Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus SH-2
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was released 2 years after the SH-1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the SH-1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SH-1
E-M1 II | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | March 2014 | Newer by 31 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SH-1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SH-1
E-M1 II | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the SH-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SH-1 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The pic below should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SH-1.
To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 380 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $349 |