Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was manufactured 8 months after the SH-3 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SH-3
E-M1 II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | February 2016 | More modern by 8 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SH-3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SH-3
E-M1 II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SH-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SH-3 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SH-3.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $579 |