Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was manufactured 8 months after the SH-3 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SH-3
E-M1 II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2016 | More modern by 8 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SH-3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SH-3
E-M1 II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus SH-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II vs the SH-3.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SH-3 is 68 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SH-3.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail price | $1,700 | $579 |