Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 7 years after the 8000 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the 8000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 8000
E-M1 II | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 88 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-M1 II
8000 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 8000
E-M1 II | 8000 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faa0a/faa0a7ab2f789767349cc7243516ddca18d23116" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 8000 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f75f5/f75f59764f475d9d1181b11924da37a155b47fc9" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and 8000.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a9e/55a9e4a518a123cab5780c516f062fa57528e0d6" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58346/58346d92bb9ff0537b002a9621b2befab8aff3aa" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 182 grams (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $380 |