Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 8010, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the 8010 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the 8010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 8010
E-M1 II | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 81 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-M1 II
8010 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 8010
E-M1 II | 8010 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the 8010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6ac4/e6ac4b9bd48757400b4daa678b1c52de9a461bee" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 8010 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b98bb/b98bb27c332414a7449549d57d6e9634ad728bb1" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and 8010.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2edf9/2edf91937d5440169be9c013e3b89dbe6333d8f3" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d58d/4d58d33d3a77a20236e5d2fd02b215c6c5c2fb31" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 8010 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |