Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Overview

The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 8010, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years after the 8010 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the 8010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 8010

 E-M1 II 8010 
LaunchedSeptember 2016February 2010Newer by 81 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 8010 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 8010

 E-M1 II 8010 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the 8010.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 8010 is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and 8010.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Olympus 8010
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
28
decent MP (13MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus 8010 as a Street photography camera
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
has focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (245 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 8010 as a Sports photography camera
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Olympus 8010 Travel photography details
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
environment sealing
has focus via touch
resolution is good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
64
weather proof
decent MP (13MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (245g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Olympus 8010
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
not so great battery power (350 shots)
40
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Olympus 8010 Vlogging details
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone port
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
27
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (245 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 8010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 8010
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus Stylus Tough 8010
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Alternate name - mju Tough 8010
Class Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2016-09-19 2010-02-02
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 13 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 245 grams (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Dual One
Cost at release $1,700 $600