Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was introduced 2 years after the TG-850 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-850 iHS 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2014Newer by 33 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TG-850 iHS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-850 iHS 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the TG-850 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and TG-850 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TG-850 iHS.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
supports RAW files
35
decent megapixels (16MP)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Olympus TG-850 iHS Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
provides touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than average (574 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
69
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
51
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery power (330 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than average (574g)
weather sealing
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
low battery pack (350 shots)
72
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
two card slots
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
50
reasonably wide (21mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus TG-850 iHS
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
lighter than average (574g)
33
reasonably wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Category Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2016-09-19 2014-01-29
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4616 x 3464
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lbs) 218 gr (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 330 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Two One
Price at launch $1,700 $250