Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-860, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 20 months later than the TG-860 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II matches up against the TG-860 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-860
| E-M1 II | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 |  | February 2015 | More recent by 20 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| TG-860 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-860
| E-M1 II | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TG-860.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-860 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TG-860.
Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 224 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $279 |