Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-10, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was introduced 3 years after the XZ-10 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the XZ-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 45 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
XZ-10 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 II | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II and the XZ-10.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and XZ-10 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and XZ-10.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 240 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $428 |