Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was introduced 4 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades against the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 57 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1030k | Crisper display (+7k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-820 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II and the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1853/d1853a9205a5ef0333d18f89daa6e0430fcc4980" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-820 iHS is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ca07/8ca07fcea02e11c3d8edf04ff878e9fedff7f7cc" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dadbf/dadbf004cdf654936958d197a9ec53c0ce7c25a9" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad00d/ad00d285b679508363ab793a9da1bad903eda460" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $500 |