Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M1 II was introduced 4 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades against the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-820 iHS 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2012Fresher by 57 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k1030kCrisper display (+7k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TG-820 iHS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-820 iHS 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II and the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-820 iHS is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TG-820 iHS.

Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography features
76
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
27
includes face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography factors
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than competition (574g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
75
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery life (350 shots)
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
environment sealing
offers focus via touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
59
weather proofing
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
low MP (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography information
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
two card slots
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
38
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Vlogging camera
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone socket
lighter than competition (574 grams)
33
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
missing external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus TG-820 iHS
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2016-09-19 2012-02-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 1,030 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lbs) 206g (0.45 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 220 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 One
Retail pricing $1,700 $500