Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 4 years later than the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the TG-1 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | May 2012 | More recent by 54 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 610k | Sharper display (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-1 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and TG-1 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and TG-1 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-05-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 610k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Price at release | $1,700 | $399 |