Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus TG-4
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-3, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was introduced 2 years later than the TG-3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 II scores against the TG-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-3
E-M1 II | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | March 2014 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-3
E-M1 II | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II against the TG-3.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and TG-3 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail price | $1,700 | $350 |