Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 II was released 18 months after the TG-4 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II grades against the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-4
E-M1 II | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2015 | Newer by 18 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-4 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-4
E-M1 II | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II and the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c155e/c155e4847edaee5573d570aada38c0a355e99aa4" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-4 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01bff/01bffd192c61686c80074791a2ae26f3893a191f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TG-4.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ff50/8ff50616dd593eed5fa173d76c589c282545ea3d" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/828e5/828e53371abafe88ecfe8d4e1fc4ce1aa53e2933" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 380 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $379 |