Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 8 months before the TG-5 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the TG-5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Tough TG-5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-5
E-M1 II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-5 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | ![]() | September 2016 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-5
E-M1 II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca8c/4ca8c82f2b1641d1097a01b9f1ad297cc919cd03" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and TG-5 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b00c/7b00c327f728b57aaa48fd626f15d8deeeef3ce8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TG-5.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a337a/a337a1f54451e118e83ca474a6ffd469cba3c123" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac8a1/ac8a1f6db431ae88f2aa95e4920c6e7a096d27bd" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 340 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $449 |