Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-110, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 5 years later than the VG-110 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1 II grades vs the VG-110 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus VG-110. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VG-110
E-M1 II | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 69 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VG-110 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-110
E-M1 II | VG-110 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-110 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the VG-110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76bc6/76bc6431f3243dc7271f7b950a2b9942bd9f5633" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and VG-110 is 68 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2cd1/a2cd16ae745430a5b3ade8fe5bf4789216d11033" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and VG-110.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46726/4672684dd981ac1a9fd88a287a86bacf112237b0" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac0a3/ac0a366e33f3de6d38b8671e6f5f13b348022200" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 170 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $150 |