Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VG-145 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was released 5 years later than the VG-145 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the VG-145 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VG-145
E-M1 II | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2011 | More recent by 63 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VG-145 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-145
E-M1 II | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the VG-145.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and VG-145 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and VG-145.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-145 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 120 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 160 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $0 |