Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VG-160, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was released 4 years after the VG-160 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II matches up against the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VG-160
| E-M1 II | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 58 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| VG-160 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-160
| E-M1 II | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VG-160 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and VG-160 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and VG-160.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 7cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 165 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $90 |