Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VH-515, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was manufactured 4 years later than the VH-515 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II scores versus the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VH-515
E-M1 II | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | August 2012 | More recent by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VH-515 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VH-515
E-M1 II | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II and the VH-515.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and VH-515 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and VH-515.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VH-515 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $648 |