Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VR-330, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was introduced 5 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II grades vs the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VR-330
E-M1 II | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2011 | Newer by 69 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VR-330 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VR-330
E-M1 II | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the VR-330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and VR-330 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and VR-330.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VR-330 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $220 |