Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 69 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper display (+423k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
XZ-1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9836e/9836efa10ecb086eaaba1b48126669fd752745fa" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and XZ-1 is 68 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f36b/8f36b3aa6bc7fa735979718bde544cc24ce325d5" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and XZ-1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea1c2/ea1c2b37c10726c3d44ee6be7b6a9a53d2480e70" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e89c/6e89cf6bf57b5c429fb4828f33bd8b5878800655" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $567 |