Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the XZ-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 69 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Sharper display (+423k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
XZ-1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-1
E-M1 II | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the XZ-1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and XZ-1 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and XZ-1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $567 |