Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was introduced 3 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II scores against the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | December 2012 | Newer by 46 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
XZ-2 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and XZ-2 iHS is 68 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 340 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $450 |