Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was introduced 3 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II scores against the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 46 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
XZ-2 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M1 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03e65/03e650c2c5a5211a920e4e0e8bd8b6131bf1be03" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and XZ-2 iHS is 68 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752b9/752b989ab967cea92dd00180ea491f635910ed62" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/008b8/008b89de44f8c4529e38af0aabd3c12a09e50547" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/773e1/773e1ee0f0a353679102191a97b6b355c5831378" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 340 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $450 |