Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Launched February 2018
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the GX9 (20MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was unveiled 17 months prior to the GX9 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GX9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the GX9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic GX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic GX9
E-M1 II | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX9 over the Olympus E-M1 II
GX9 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | September 2016 | Newer by 17 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 1037k | Clearer display (+203k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GX9
E-M1 II | GX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic GX9 has dimensions of 124mm x 72mm x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") having a weight of 407 grams (0.90 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the GX9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GX9 is 68 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GX9.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of pictures although you should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 407g (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $1,000 |